Bests & Worsts Reviews from Amazon

I was a huge fan of Goodkind through the first four books, then I began to dread a new book by him. It seemed that with each new book his writing became worse and worse. Knowing that this was the last book in the series I became hopeful that he would pull a rabbit out of a hat and finally write the way he did in the beginning and allow the reader to become invested in the plot again. It was this very hope that I allowed myself to feed off of that let me down and brought me back to the realization that Goodkind has fallen off his rocker. Goodkind's writing style can be summed up easily. First, he takes a monotone style of writing about characters and their dialogue and doesn't inject anything into the characters. You could be reading a line from Jagang, from Richard, Zedd, Six, Khalan, Rachel or any character and without the reference to the storyline you wouldn't be able to tell who was talking! There is no character development that distinguishes one from another. And his attempt at characterizations are childish. Take, for example, an interaction between Richard and a bunch of rough and tumble tough guys who are captives or soldiers. Richard is trying to explain why they need their faces painted and one of the men pipes up "Do me next, will you, Ruben?" then another says "Then me" and Richard says "One at a time". These supposed tough guys are acting like 3 year olds with their mother, and this is Goodkind's attempt at characterization? Then Goodkind needs filler, so he writes and writes about nothing. A typical conversation is actually a 2.5 page monologue without a break or a stop at all. They just keep talking. Or sometimes he will try to explain something over and over again in different ways. You know, to make you understand. That way if you understand you will know, just as sure as you were born. Right, and if I explain it to you four different ways back to back to back then maybe you might understand? Oh, and then the other person will start a monologue and the previous person will patiently stand aside. Or here is the most annoying. Goodkind explains how terrified Rachel is of Six and then Six asks a question and scared, timid Rachel pipes up and delivers a monologue explaining all the details of how she knew how to paint. Yeah, great job Goodkind, she is really afraid. Finally, it is the philosophic tirades and monologues that ultimately kill this book. These monologues go on for pages and you could honestly skip ahead three pages and you wouldn't have missed a single thing. Or this was the best. In the end Richard gives a 5 page monologue without a single break. The whole thing is him talking. Ridiculous. Where did Goodkind think that that is good writing? When did he think that a whole book should be one big long explanation after another? One redeeming value of the book was that we did see a hint of the old Goodkind after the last Ja'La match and I was finally able to read through it all without wincing at the horrid writing. Finally, the most redeeming value of the book is that it is finally over and Goodkind can quietly live his life on the millions he is probably making in quiet seclusion, hopefully never writing another book. I for one will never read another Goodkind book now that the series that I had already invested so much time into and therefore had to finish is over. .5 stars.